Slide 1
WinDSSOcK: Winter
Distribution and Success of Southern Ocean Krill: 2001 Drifter Measurements
|
|
|
R. Limeburner, R. Beardsley and B.
Owens |
|
|
|
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution |
"HYPOTHESIS"
|
|
|
HYPOTHESIS |
|
The study area has "a shelf circulation
(cyclonic gyre) that retains the krill population in a favorable environment
on the shelf for extended periods of time”. |
|
|
|
PROJECT GOAL |
|
Characterize Western Antarctic Peninsula |
|
shelf circulation processes and their
spatial and temporal variability using satellite-tracked near-surface
drifters, long term moorings and deep isobaric floats. |
WOCE SVP Drifter
|
|
|
|
Modifications |
|
|
|
ice strengthened buoy hull |
|
|
|
cold weather batteries |
|
|
|
|
Gould Cruise Mar 18 – Apr
13, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Deployed six current meter moorings
near Marguerite Bay, Antarctica. |
|
|
|
Deployed six drifters with drogues
centered at 15 m. Eight drifters deployed by Palmer during May, 2001 |
|
|
|
Deployed 8 acoustic moorings to monitor
whales. |
|
|
Slide 6
Seasonal Sea Ice
Distribution
Large-scale Drifter
Tracks
|
|
|
Solid blue circles are deployment
positions. |
|
|
|
Bay covered with ice by July, 2001. |
|
|
|
Inner-shelf flow to SW |
|
|
|
Outer-shelf flow to NW |
|
|
Marguerite Bay Drifter
Tracks
|
|
|
Blue deployment locations |
|
Cyclonic flow in Bay |
|
Clear inflow/outflow circulation in Bay |
|
NW flow on outer shelf |
|
Drifter animation next |
|
|
|
|
Slide 10
Slide 11
Rothera LP Windstress
Weak Wind Driven Response
|
|
|
The weak mid-shelf surface drifter
velocities were surprising due to the strong winds observed during the 2001
cruises. The slow drifter speeds during large wind stress events may be due
to the deep surface mixed layer (~ 50 m).
For an Ekman layer balance, |
|
|
|
f * u * h = τ / ρ |
|
|
|
for τ = 5 dynes/cm2, h
= 50m, f = 1.3 10-4/s, u ~ 1.6 cm/s. Thus, the wind driven
response on the open WAP shelf may be weak. |
|
|
Lagrangian Time and Space
Scales
The Lagrangian autocorrelation function was computed for each drifter velocity
component, and then integrated from zero lag to the first zero crossing of the
autocorrelation to give a Lagrangian integral time scale. The Lagrangian space
scale was then found by multiplying the integral time scale by the rms velocity
for each component.
|
|
|
Mean u Lagrangian time scale = 2.9 days |
|
Mean v Lagrangian time scale = 1.8 days |
|
Mean x Lagrangian space scale = 27 km |
|
Mean y Lagrangian space scale = 18 km |
Mean Flow
|
|
|
Inflow near Adelaide Island. |
|
|
|
Outflow near Alexander Island. |
|
|
|
Weaker mean flow at mid-shelf. |
|
|
|
Greater variability near Alexander
Island. |
Maximum Velocity
|
|
|
April – July, 2001. |
|
|
|
Cyclonic eddy in Marguerite Bay. |
|
|
|
Weakest flow over the mid-shelf. |
|
|
|
NW flow over the outer-shelf. |
|
|
Rymill Bay
Eddies
|
|
|
Located NE Marguerite Bay. |
|
6 cyclones and 2 anticyclones over 40
days. |
|
2 – 5 day periods. |
|
|
|
|
High Frequency Motion
|
|
|
The inertial period is about 12.99
hours. |
|
|
|
A simple model consisting of a mean
current plus an inertial component was fit in a least-squares sense to the
drifter position data. |
|
|
|
One elliptical drifter track had a
major axis of 16.8 cm/s and a minor axis of 10.5 cm/s, with the major axis
oriented toward 28 ON. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Field
Program
R/V GOULD cruise February 2002
|
|
|
|
Recover |
|
6 WHOI current meter moorings |
|
8 SIO acoustic whale moorings |
|
Deploy |
|
3 current meter moorings |
|
8 acoustic moorings |
|
6/10 drifters |
|
12 floats |
Slide 20