Report of Activities on the RVIB
N.B. Palmer Cruise 02-02
Work down on the Western
Antarctic Continental shelf in the fall and winter often seems like an endless
collection of cloudy dreary days with little sunlight, but every once in a
while a day comes along that is really quite special. April 18 was one of those
days. The first view of
There are two principal sets of
mountain peaks on
The work was completed during 18
April at stations 15, 16, and 17, and included 3 CTDs,
2 MOCNESS tows, and a 1-m Reeve net tow.
Along track work, however, only consisted of bird and mammal surveying
because it was discovered, when BIOMAPER-II was brought on board at the start of
station 15, that there was a broken strand of the outer armor on the towing
cable. This necessitated the cutting of
the cable behind the break and re-termination of the end of the cable. This process took about 12 hours and no
acoustics or video data were collected between stations 15 to 17 and part of
the way to station 18.
As noted above, the weather on 18
April was close to ideal. During the early morning hours, the wind was out of
the northeast at 15 to 20 kts, the air temperature
was 0.3ºC (above freezing), and the barometric pressure was 982.1 mlb, up a bit from the last few days. By mid-afternoon, the wind speed was close to
zero, the sea surface was glassy, and a good portion of the sky was cloud-free.
The CTD group did 3 casts today.
All three were similar to coastal stations not affected by oceanic intrusions.
Energetic layering, with thicknesses ranging from 1 m to above 10 m, was seen
throughout the pycnocline (middle third of the
cast). The only unusual feature was the
two-layered surface layer (cold over warm) over the weak winter water layer.
The deep temperature maximum was below 1.5ºC, so this water has been on the
shelf for a while.
Station 15 (Cast 18, 545 m) had
considerable temperature structure in the upper 100 m with a uniform mixed
layer (-0.8ºC) to 30 m, a warmer layer (-0.5ºC, 30 m thick) and a cold layer
the same temperature as the surface layer. The pycnocline
was inhabited with several 10 m thick layers and numerous 1-2 m layers. The
deep temperature maximum (1.5ºC) was at 300 m.
Station 16 (Cast 19, 515 m) had
much the same structure as the previous cast, except the surface layer was only
20 m thick and the warmer surface layer was 50 m thick. Surface temperature was
below -1.0ºC. Energetic layering occurred throughout the cast, but was
strongest in the pycnocline. The deep temperature
maximum (1.4ºC) was at 300 m.
Station 17 (Cast 20, 434 m) had a
surface layer with gradually increasing density to about 75 m. There was small scale structure in
temperature and salinity through the upper 200 m of the cast. The deep temperature maximum (1.4ºC) was
around 300 m.
Marine Mammal report (Debra
Glasgow)
The marine mammal survey began
well at 0815 on 18 April while transiting to Station 16. It was overcast, but visibility was good and
the
Matt Becker sighted a like minke
whale 300 meters away at 1158 porpoising to port with
the characteristic v-shaped bow wave, heading away from the ship at -66 57.30ºS;
-69 32.33ºW. At 1322, three sei whales were sighted
at -67 00.69ºS; -69 21.51ºW, 3 nautical miles to port at 270º. The animals
milled at the surface, their tall upright columnar blows seen repeatedly. The same type of 'blows' were seen again in
the same area at 1619, this time 7 nautical miles away, and directly ahead of
the ship as we headed back the way we had come while towing the MOCNESS nets.
This was our best day of survey yet, as the sea calmed right down to
Marine Mammal passive
listening report (Ana Sirovic)
During the period from April
14-18, a total of 9 sonobuoys were deployed. Seven of
them were omnidirectional and 2 were directional (Difar - fixing and ranging) sonobuoys. Blue whale calls were heard on 7 of the sonobuoys. Most of
the calls were rather faint and distant, with a couple of exceptions. An omni
deployed on April 16 showed some blue whale calls, and after Deb Glasgow
reported having seen something that could have been a blue whale ~350 m from
the ship, a Difar buoy was deployed as well. The
calls heard on that buoy were rather loud and it was able to provide bearings
on the calling whale. The first set of
bearings showed that the animal was swimming in the north-northeasterly
direction, which coincided with the swimming direction observed by Deb. Bearings determined approximately 20 min
later showed an animal swimming in the southwesterly direction. It is hard to tell if this was the same animal
that changed its swimming direction or if it was a different animal. Unfortunately, BIOMAPER-II was at depth at the
time and it was not possible to get off the transect
and attempt to locate the calling animal.
Another set of loud blue whale
calls was heard on an omni deployed on April 18. This deployment occurred at night, while
transiting between stations 17 and 18, and no visual confirmations were possible. But calling patterns implied the presence of
at least 2-3 calling animals. Calling continued
for over an hour, at which point the signal from the sonobuoy
got too weak and monitoring the animals became impossible.
Sea Birds (Erik Chapman and
Matthew Becker)
On April 18, we surveyed in
excellent conditions for 4 and a half hours between stations
15 and 17. This transit took us close to
land, finishing about 10 nautical miles from the southern end of
Species (common name) |
Species (scientific name) |
Number observed |
|
Daption capense |
17 |
Southern Fulmar |
Fulmarus glacialoides |
14 |
Antarctic Petrel |
Thalassoica |
1 |
Blue Petrel |
Halobaena caerulea
|
0 |
Unidentified Prion |
|
0 |
Grey-headed Albatross |
Diomedea chrysostoma |
1 |
|
Oceanites oceanicus
|
4 |
Unidentified Skua |
|
0 |
Southern Giant Petrel |
Macronectes giganteus |
2 |
Antarctic Fur Seal |
Arctocephalus gazella |
16 |
Material Properties of
Zooplankton Report (Dezang Chu,
Peter Wiebe)
At station 17, a 1-m Reeve net
tow was made to about 350 m. Although
there was a persistent scattering layer between 290-350 m from the echogram of
the Simrad EK500 echo sounder, only a handful of
juvenile krill were caught. There were not sufficient individuals to do either
a shipboard laboratory experiment or an over-the-side APOP profile experiment.
During the day, there was an attempt to use the experimental chamber on shipboard to measure the density contrast of only two adult krill instead of the more than 10 krill used in the previous experiment. This was done to determine just how few individuals could be used and still get reliable information. These krill individuals were collected on the 15 April and were kept alive in a large tank in the aquarium room with running seawater. The measured density contrast, however, was erroneous (less than unity) due to the limited accuracy in weight and density measurements. So to conduct more experiments, additional live krill need to be collected.
Zooplankton
(MOCNESS/BIOMAPER-II) report (Carin Ashjian, Peter Wiebe)
MOCNESS tow #4 was conducted on
18 April at approximately 0430 at mid-shelf on the third transect line of the
survey. The bottom depth was
approximately 500 m and the tow was conducted to 479 m. Some krill were observed below 350 m. Copepods were seen throughout the water column
with the exception of the upper 25 m. Chaetognaths were seen below 250 m. Krill furcilia were observed from 75 to 150 m. Salps were observed at 250-350 m, 75-100 m, and 25-50
m. Algae was
found in the 25-76 m depth range.
Amphipods were abundant from 0-25 m along with some krill.
The second MOCNESS Tow (#5) taken
on April 18 was done in the late afternoon at station 17, located near
BIOMAPER-II was collecting data
during 18 April during the transit to Station 15, but as noted above, it was
sidelined on the deck after a broken strand in the outer armor of the towing
cable was found about 0330 while bringing the towed body on board the Palmer.
Examination of the wire and over boarding sheave assembly revealed
another problem. One of the newly
installed rollers on the sheave was also damaged beyond repair. Once the decision to re-terminate the wire
was made, it took about 12 hours to complete the work. Putting a termination on the end of an electro-optical
towing cable is a complicated process.
The cable termination itself is a heavy stainless block of steel that
allows the towed body to be coupled to the end of the towing wire. It has been precision machined so that the
cable end can be held fast and not give way under the high
tensions and stresses that are imposed on it as BIOMAPER-II is towed, often in
high seas. After disassembly of the
previous assembly, the new cable end was threaded through the termination and
the wire strands making up the cable armor were worked into a bird cage that was
then pulled back into a tapered cylindrical opening on the outer end of the
termination. The opening was then filled
with a molten metal called Cerrobend that has a
melting point of about 180ºF. Potting the opening with metal secures the end of
the cable to the termination. The cable and termination combo can withstand
pulls of more than 10,000 lbs. Then the
inner cable core, which extends about 4 meters beyond the termination and has
three electrical and three optical fibers, was equipped with connectors that
can be plugged into the under water housings located inside the towed body.
Making such water tight splices is also a time consuming process. Finally, a rubber boot had to be fashioned
out of self vulcanizing rubber tape to prevent sharp bending of the cable where
it enters the termination. The time and effort it takes to make up a new cable
termination makes it desirable not to do this more than about once per cruise.
While the cable was being
re-terminated, the roller on the sheave was replaced with a backup method of
keeping the wire in place. BIOMAPER-II
was put back in service about 2130 on 18 April halfway along the transit to
station 18.
During the early morning transit
to station 15, very strong near surface patches of backscattering were
observed. These occurred sporadically and
BIOMAPER-II did not pass through any of them so that the VPR could be used to
identify their make up. Other wise, backscattering levels were relatively low
throughout the water column. During the
evening run to station 18, the backscattering levels were moderate to low and
no patches of intense scattering showed up that might have been interpreted as
krill swarms.
Cheers, Peter