Report of Activities
on the RVIB N.B. Palmer Cruise 02-02
The long anticipated steam into
The evening weather remained subdued with the wind out of
the east northeast (070) about 15 kts. The barometer was
at 982.2 mlb, and the air temperature was -1.9șC.
Sea surface temperature was -1.19șC and
salinity was 33.197, much fresher than out on the continental shelf or in the
Antarctic Circumpolar Current. There
were substantially more icebergs around the ship today and many small ice
chunks and bergy bits, but no substantial areas of
sea ice.
Work was completed during 22 April at stations 28, 29, 30,
31, 33, and part of 34. These stations,
except station 34, occurred in the very shallow water regime just below the
southern tip of
CTD Group report (John Klinck, Tim Boyer, Chris Mackay,
Julian Ashford, Andres Sepulveda, Kristin Cobb)
The CTD group did six stations today, four to depths less
than 200 m and two to depths of 500 or more. All stations showed either deep
uniform mixed layers or multilayered mixed layers reflecting, I think, the changeable
winds (calm to strong). Only one station had a Winter Water (WW) layer; deep
mixing from recent strong winds has eroded WW at many stations. Surface
temperatures were variable, but tended to be below -1.0șC. Surface chlorophyll
also showed wide variability (from 0.1 to 0.6 ug/l),
but very little vertical structure down to the base of the deepest mixed layer
(50 to 70 m). The shallow stations (100-150 m) did not have any special deep structure;
bottom temperature and salinity character was consistent with adjacent deeper
water. Subpycnocline temperatures tended to be below
1.3șC with no indication of a temperature maximum or
oceanic water.
An ad-hoc ADCP observation (I happened to look at the
display) at station 29 (SW of the southern tip of
Station 28 (cast 32, 458 m) Uniform surface layer to 50 m
(-1.2șC, 33.5). Surface chlorophyll was 0.6 ug/l. Thin (3 m), large amplitude layers were just
under the mixed layer. Small-scale structure occurred through pycnocline to 200m.
There was no temperature maximum, but deep temperature was around 1.3șC.
Station 29 (cast 33, 155 m) Uniform surface layer to 80 m
(-0.9șC, 33.4). Surface chlorophyll was 0.2 ug/l. There
was small scale variability from 100 m to the bottom.
Station 30 (cast 34, 183 m) Thin surface layer to 10 m
(-1.2șC, 33.3) with considerable temperature and salinity structure from 10 to
20 m. Two relic mixed layers occurred
from 20 to 50 m then to 120 m, with temperature and salinity jumps between
layers of +0.2șC and 0.15, respectively.
Surface chlorophyll was 0.1 ug/l
declining to 0.08 at 100 m.
Station 31 (cast 35, 186) Uniform surface
layer to 70 m (-1.1șC, 33.3).
Surface chlorophyll was 0.15 ug/l. Temperature and salinity increased linearly
to the bottom with persistent layers (2-3 m thickness).
Station 33 (cast 36, 198 m) Uniform surface layer to 50 m
(-1.0șC, 33.4). Below was a relic mixed
layer to 75 m. Surface
chlorophyll was 0.2 ug/l. There was a mainly linear increase in
temperature and salinity to the bottom with step increases every 50 m.
Station 34 (cast 37, 657 m) Uniform surface layer to 50 m
(-1.4șC, 33.3). The WW layer was between
50 and 80 m. Surface
chlorophyll was 0.1 ug/l. There was weak variability in the pycnocline to 200 m.
There was no temperature maximum; deep temperature was 1.3șC.
Microstructure Profiler (CMiPS)
report (Chris Mackay)
Since its installation for station 3, the microstructure
instrument has acquired data at all CTD stations with the exception of 12, 21,
and 22. For those stations, it was removed from the CTD as the water depth
would exceed its pressure limit. These time periods provided the opportunity to
make some adjustments to the instrument, replace the mechanical hard disc with
a solid state drive, and change a temperature probe. As the instrument is new
and, due to the very large amount of data generated, only a small proportion of
the data has been analyzed so far, with the objective of evaluating the
performance of the instrument. The bulk
of the data will be analyzed after the cruise.
The instrument is operating as expected and valuable experience is also
being obtained in deployment of the instrument in and around floating ice.
Procedures for removing and reinstalling the instrument in the CTD frame have
been working well, although so far the sea state has been favorable.
Marine Mammal report (Debra Glasgow)
The marine mammal survey began on 22 April at 0815 on
Incidental watch in excellent conditions, great visibility, a
Sea Birds (Erik Chapman and Matthew Becker)
Seabird survey related work began on April 22 with a net tow
for surface zooplankton at station 29 before sunrise. The ring net went to 50 m and little biomass
was collected at this station compared with other stations. This station was also different from others,
in that there were few, if any, amphipods and very little phytoplankton. We did catch copepods and a few larval krill
in the tow. The Palmer was underway and surveying from station 29 by 0930 when
BIOMAPER-II was put in the water. We
also surveyed between stations 30, 31 and 33 on a course along the southern
shore of
Three species of seals were observed during the survey; Fur
Seals, Crabeater Seals, and Leopard Seals (see todays mammal observation
report). We finished the day with a net
tow after dark at station 33. Again,
little biomass was collected in the 0 to 70 oblique net tow. Phytoplankton, amphipods, and copepods were
present, but overall, biomass from this sample was low.
A summary of the species and number of individuals of birds
and seals observed during 4 hours, 49 minutes of daytime surveys between
consecutive stations 29 and 33 is the following:
Species (common name) |
Species (scientific name) |
Number observed |
|
Daption capense |
74 |
Southern Fulmar |
Fulmarus glacialoides |
112 |
Blue-eyed Shag |
Phalacrocorax atriceps |
12 |
Antarctic Tern |
Sterna vittata |
2 |
|
Oceanites oceanicus
|
7 |
Unidentified Skua |
|
2 |
Snow Petrel |
Pagodroma nivea |
1 |
Southern Giant Petrel |
Macronectes giganteus |
27 |
Kelp Gull |
Larus dominicanus |
76 |
Leopard Seal |
Hydrurga leptonyx |
1 |
Crabeater Seal |
Lobodon
carcinophagus |
26 |
Antarctic Fur Seal |
Arctocephalus gazella |
7 |
Material Properties of Zooplankton Report (Dezang Chu, Peter Wiebe)
Two Reeve net tows to collect live animals for material
properties measurements were made at station 29 and station 34. At station 29,
the water depth was 170 and a scattering layer was located around 100 m on Simrad EK 500 echo sounder (both 120 and 200 kHz
echograms). The Reeve net was deployed almost to the bottom and was towed for
about 30 minutes. About a dozen live adult krill (E. superba) and a number of juveniles were caught. Around
Zooplankton (MOCNESS/BIOMAPER-II) report (Carin Ashjian, Peter Wiebe)
MOCNESS Tow # 8 was conducted early in the morning (0300) on
22 April just southwest of
An aftermath of the 21 April storm was the damaged
BIOMAPER-II towing cable described in the last report and the effort needed to
re-terminate the cable. That effort went through the night and was completed in
time for the deployment of BIOMAPER-II at the end of the work at station 29. A
superb job was done by the BIOMAPER-II tech group (led at different times in
the night by Andy Girard, Mark Dennett, Phil Alatalo
and Peter Martin) and the Ratheyon Marine Techs
(Jenny While, Steve Tarrent and Stian
Alesandrini) in getting the towed body and cable operational.
In addition to fixing the wire, repairs were made to the rollers, which
fairlead the cable on the over boarding sheave.
Upon leaving station 29, an intense patch of scatterers occurred right near the surface, which may have
been krill. Not long after than a few
more small krill-like patches were observed near the surface. The extremely variable topography in this
area prevented towyos to any substantial depth, but
when the bottom dropped off to deeper depths, the down-looking transducers
revealed that there was considerable scattering close to the bottom, especially
on the 200 kHz echogram. As the day
progressed, backscattering in the upper water column became much lower and
there were few acoustic targets present. Most of the moderately intense
backscattering occurred in the valleys below the peaks in the bottom
topography. During the run between
station 31 and 33, the strongest backscattering was near the bottom and the
surface layer had little.
A side effect of working in very shallow water is that the
acoustic noise generated by the ships engines and other machinery reverberates
more effectively in the shallow water column. This had a pronounced effect on
the 43 kHz echograms, which was dominated by ships noise and to a lesser extent
on the 120 kHz record for most of two transits between stations 29 to 30 and 31
to 33.
During the towyo starting at
station 29, the VPR camera system stopped working. The towed body was brought
on deck at station 30 and trouble shooting of the system began. A retainer ring holding the strobe light lens
had come loose inside the pressure case and allowed the lens to move out of
alignment. The system was repaired during
the transit to station 31 and BIOMAPER-II was re-deployed at the end of station
work there. Unfortunately, the one of
the two cameras was still not working properly because of an alignment problem,
so at the end to the transit to station 33, the towed body was again retrieved
and during the short transit station 34, the VPR was worked on again.
Cheers, Peter