Report of Activities
on the RVIB N.B. Palmer Cruise 02-02
2 May 2002
On 2 May, the SO GLOBEC broad-scale survey nearly reached
the seaward end of line 8. A large
topographic feature off the continental shelf that has raised bottom depths
lies centered just to the northwest of this survey line. The feature is thought
to contribute to the meandering in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current in this
region and perhaps to the development of the intrusions of oceanic water onto
the shelf that make it into
The day was dark and gray, with intermittent snow and fog in
the morning. The afternoon was clearer with light winds continuing to be the
norm (about 10 kts out of the northwest) and a calm
sea. The barometer climbed during the day to 1002.7 mlb,
the highest reading yet since leaving
The work at the stations included 4 CTDs
one each at stations 63, 64, 65, 66, and a drops of XBTs
at station 67 (attempts to deploy XCTDs failed because
of electrical problems with the probes and cabling). An APOP cast was conducted at station 66 and
a 1-m ring net surface tow was taken at stations 63 and 66. During the transits between stations,
BIOMAPER-II was towyoed to below 200 m, and seabird
and marine mammal observations were made during daylight when the visibility
permitted. Two sonobuoys
were deployed along the trackline.
CTD Group report (John Klinck, Tim Boyer, Chris Mackay,
Julian Ashford, Andres Sepulveda, Kristin Cobb)
The CTD group did four CTD casts and two XBT drops over the
outer shelf and oceanic part of the 300 line. The stations span the shelf break
and show deep temperatures from shelf-like 1.3ºC to oceanic 1.8ºC. The mixed
layer was mainly 50 m thick, but Station 65 had a thin (20 m) mixed layer for unknown
reasons. The most offshore station was clearly within the southern edge of the
ACC.
The deep CTD casts, starting with station 66 (cast 70) to
station 70, use double oxygen sensors to investigate the oxygen hysteresis issue. On cast 70, the oxygen sensors were
rather different (by almost 1.0 ug/l) on the
downcast, but agreed to with 0.1 ug/l on the upcast. These sensors need some time to soak, so no judgement is made at this time about the relative behavior
of these sensors.
An attempt was made to do XCTD and XBT at station 67, as a
replacement for a lengthy CTD cast. After trying 3 XCTD probes, we could not
get a load indicator. Two T5 XBTs were thrown with the deepest lasting to 800 m. After
some effort, an XCTD probe was loaded, but we had long passed the station, so
only the temperature record was obtained.
Station 63 (cast 67, 323 m). There
was a uniform mixed layer to 50 m (-1.3ºC, 33.6 psu,
0.2 ug/l chlorophyll). Energetic layers (5-8 m) occurred to 120 m
with thinner layers to 200 m. The deep temperature was 1.3ºC with no
temperature maximum.
Station 64 (cast 68, 426 m). There
was a uniform mixed layer to 50 m (-1.4ºC, 33.55 psu,
0.15 ug/l chlorophyll). A warm layer at 60 m was above a weak Winter
Water (WW) layer centered at 80 m and weak small-scale variability was in the pycnocline. The deep
temperature below 320 m was 1.3ºC with no temperature maximum.
Station 65 (cast 69, 427 m). A uniform mixed layer occurred to 20 m (-1.4ºC,
33.55 psu, 0.2 ug/l
chlorophyll). There was a gradual
temperature and salinity increase from the mixed layer to 300 m, with a weak WW
layer at 90 m to break the monotonicity of temperature. There were numerous temperature reversals
(3-5 m) in the pycnocline. The deep temperature
maximum (1.6ºC) was at 300 m.
Station 66 (cast 70, 1136 m). On
this cast, there were double oxygen sensors on the CTD, using the par
channel. A uniform mixed layer occurred to 60 m (-1.2ºC,
33.7 psu, 0.3 ug/l
chlorophyll) with a weak WW layer at 100 m.
There was clear layering between 100 and 200 m. The temperature maximum (1.6ºC) was at 300 m
and there was a temperature minimum (0.9ºC) at 1100 m.
Station 67 (XCTD, XBT). We tried three XCTDs,
but could not get any to load. Two T5 XBTs were run,
but only a cast to 800 m was obtained.
The temperature maximum (1.8ºC) was at 300 m. There were clear temperature layers from 100
to 350 m.
Marine Mammal report (Debra Glasgow)
May 2 was another day of fog, some snow, and variable
visibility, although sightability did improve in the
afternoon. The
Sea Birds (Erik Chapman and Matthew Becker)
When the sun came up on 2 May, there was a thick fog and
calm winds as we traveled to station 65 about mid-shelf at the southern edge of
Bird observations during today's survey were consistent with
the open water habitat and limited food availability indicated by BIOMAPER-II
acoustics. We observed open water
species in low abundance during the survey, with a relatively large number of
Antarctic Petrels in the mix.
Snow Petrels distribution is believed to be closely associated with ice cover, and this has been generally the case during the SO GLOBEC cruises. However, today, as during last year's cruises, Snow Petrels were observed in small numbers in open water far away from sea ice. This is an interesting finding that suggests prey found in association with ice that is available at the surface is at times limited. During these times, Snow Petrels may supplement their diet by foraging in open water, outside of their preferred ice habitat.
A summary of the species and number of individuals of birds
and seals within the 300 m transect during 4 hours, 8 minutes of daytime
surveys between consecutive stations 63 and 66 is the following:
Species (common name) |
Species (scientific name) |
Number observed |
|
Daption capense |
5 |
Southern Fulmar |
Fulmarus glacialoides |
4 |
Antarctic Petrel |
Thalassoica |
28 |
Blue Petrel |
Halobaena caeulea |
7 |
Southern Giant Petrel |
Macronectes gfiganteus |
4 |
Snow Petrel |
Pagodroma nivea |
7 |
Water Sampling for Microzooplankton
(Phil Alatalo)
Survey transect 7 ran inshore to some deep troughs inside
Material Properties of Zooplankton Report (Dezang Chu, Peter Wiebe)
The animals used in the combined shipboard and APOP cast
measurements on May 2 were copepods (more than 98 % were Calanus). These small
crustaceans, very different in body form from the euphausiids,
can be very abundant throughout the water column in the SO GLOBEC study site
and can be important contributors to the acoustic backscattering at the higher
frequencies. These animals are much smaller than krill and have a large portion
of lipids in their body. The mean length and standard deviation of the copepods
used in the measurements were 4.1 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively. The cast was
made at station 66 (67 49.870ºS; 74 13.350ºW). In contrast to krill, the sound
speed and density contrasts of these copepods were both less than unity. The accurate
density measurement was difficult using the current dual-density method, since
the density of the seawater and distilled water mixture contained too many
micro-particles that altered the density of pure fluid mixture significantly.
To obtain a reasonable estimate of the density contrast, error analysis and
numerical simulations were performed. Even with the values by taking into
account the extreme errors that were reasonable from the measurements, the
density contrast was still less than unity. The best estimate from our analysis
for the density contrast of the Calanus was 0.995, a number that was almost equal to unity.
This result was consistent with what we observed before the density
measurement: most animals floated on the surface of the beaker, indicating that
these animals were positively buoyant.
The mean value of the sound speed contrast from the
shipboard measurement was 0.959 and the mean value from the cast was 0.949,
with a standard deviation of 0.013. The difference in mean value between down
and up casts was 0.005, which was a reasonable value. There was no obvious bias
between the down and up casts. However, there was a distinct pattern observed
in the sound speed contrast for both down and up casts. The sound speed
contrast was more or less a constant from the surface to about 100 m,
corresponding to a basically constant sound speed in water, or temperature,
within the same depth range. Below 100 m, the sound speed in water increased as
a function of depth, with a gradient of 0.12 m/s/m, or 0.08% per meter, while
the corresponding sound speed contrast of copepods decreased (negative
gradient) with a rate of 0.03% per meter. This negative gradient was very clear
and definitive, especially for the down cast (monotonic). This result is
consistent with and also confirms what we ob served on the Calanus finmarchicus from a different cruise to
Zooplankton (MOCNESS/BIOMAPER-II) report (Carin Ashjian, Peter Wiebe)
There was no MOCNESS tow taken during 2 May.
The acoustic, video, and environmental sensor survey with
BIOMAPER-II continued without interruption between stations 63 to 67. During the course of the day, it was finally
determined that the cable between the upper 200 kHz transducer and the echosounder in the towed body was causing the intermittency
on that frequency. Careful inspection of
the cable for electrical continuity and water leakage did not reveal a cause,
but because this cable needed cleaning earlier in the cruise, it is suspected
that one or more of the pins on the male connecter were thinned by corrosion
and although clean, were not making good contact in one of the female sockets.
When a spare cable was used in its place, the transducer began working properly
again.
On transit across the mid-shelf region between 62 and 63,
backscattering was generally low. A few small intense patches of backscattering
were seen around 40 m on the 420, 120, and 43 kHz echograms. Further out on the shelf between station 63
and 64, a bottom layer 90 m thick was very well defined on the 120 echogram.
Small krill-like patches occurred occasionally just above the top of the bottom
layer. There was a near surface layer
starting about 50 m that fluctuated from being a weak single layer to a series
of thin layers of more somewhat more intense scattering. The latter tended to
each be 7 to 10 meters thick, similar in placement and
dimensions to those observed in the CTD profiles. There was heavier scattering
on the 1 MHz echograms as BIOMAPER-II went through the pycnocline
and bottom of the surface mixed layer, which again correlated with the presence
of diatoms and radiolarians in the VPR images and the green goo
that came up in the 1-m surface net tow at station 66. At the shelf break and
beyond, there was low scattering in most of the water column, except for some
small-scale surface patches and a very light surface backscattering below the
ships turbulence layer, which is about 8 meters thick. A very diffuse mid-depth scattering layer
started about 260 m and went down to the bottom of the echograms on the 43 and
120 kHz.
Cheers, Peter